Thursday, November 15, 2012


Horrors of Nagel
Hammy Wallace, Bennet Black & Ryan McLean

            
            Based on the data collected from the trash audit of DU, we believe that the dinning halls need to start focusing on how to provide people with waste convenience rather than consumer convenience.  Nagel is a perfect example of how poorly the University of Denver promotes its students to properly dispose of waste.  Nagel provides students with many conveniences, almost all of which produce unnecessary waste.  If DU took the small steps to correct these waste issues at Nagel, DU’s ecological footprint would be minimized. Although some of these changes would need to be funded by the school, they are necessary steps that a school of higher education must take to set an example for the rest of the world to follow.  The information gathered from the trash audit showed that an unacceptable amount of waste in the landfill bins could actually be recycled or composted.  Although education plays a major role in the improper disposal of materials, our data showed that the majority of people know where to dispose of their plastic and food waste; it is just inconvenient for them to do so.
            Although Nagel is one of the most popular dinning halls on DU’s Campus, few people stop to think about the consequences of their Nagel meals.  First off, Nagel only provides students with to-go boxes and paper plates, never reusable dinning wear.  Even if a student sits in Nagel and finishes all the food on his or her plate they are still forced to create waste by composting their plates. Although many people don’t see compost as a negative form of waste, it is always better to reuse materials instead of just disposing of it after one use. More importantly 57 percent of people who get food from Nagel leave with their food.  Of those who leave with the food, close to 90 percent of them throw away their food scrapes and dinning wear into the landfill trash bins.  The most reasonable change would be that Nagel must install a dishwashing facility adjacent to the dinning area.  Although this is a very expensive change, it is the best way to cut out the waste produced in Nagel. With the new technologies of this time, convenience has become a very important aspect in designing a product.  These new “eco-friendly” compostable dinning wear are great, but in reality it is only making DU less eco-friendly.  As strasser points out, "The new consumer culture changed ideas about throwing things away, creating a way of life that incorporated technological advances, organizational changes, and new perspectives, a lifestyle that linked products made for one-time use…" (Strasser, 200) Clearly the right thing to do is eliminate one-time use dinning wear and clean real plates.  If this is too big of a change to make so soon, it would make sense to at least add more composting bins throughout the school.  Nearly 70 percent of students know where to dispose of their dinning wear, but only six percent of them actually return to a dinning hall to compost their waste.  The problem here is not education nor ignorance, but a lack of caring and pure laziness.  A cheap solution to the amount of food waste going to landfills is to provide students with more opportunities to compost their excess food.
            Another source of waste is the large meal portions that allow students to order one meal and not have to think about returning for seconds.  The majority of the 80 people surveyed by the group stated that they normally cannot finish an entire Nagel portion.  Nearly 60 percent of the student body at DU cannot finish a full meal from Nagel.  This number is not acceptable and can easily be fixed.  If anyone from Sodexo took the time to observe how much food is being thrown out, they would have to agree that the portion sizes must be changed.  This is the problem with the most simple solution, yet is produces so much unnecessary waste every day.  In today’s times there are many small solutions that can make such a big difference the only problem is that people don’t care enough to make these small changes in their lives.  As Capra states, “There are solutions to the major problems of our time, some of them even simple.  But they require a radical shift in our perceptions, our thinking, our values (capra, 4).”  There is no excuse for the massive portions, because Sodexo would actually benefit from the smaller portions.  Although many students would be infuriated by the smaller sizes, our community at DU needs to be more aware of the changes that need to be made.
            After extensive research, the problem is quite clear; food waste is our most common waste and is also the easiest waste to dispose of. Composting is simple and efficient, it should be everywhere, but it isn’t. In Nagel we are letting hundreds of pounds of food out the door every day, only to be wasted. Change has to start somewhere and we have the opportunity to start at Nagel. Implementing non-disposable dishware would not solve the problem entirely but it would be a great start. In the end, we just need to keep taking small steps forward and solving Nagel can be DU’s next step towards an eco-friendly campus.

No comments:

Post a Comment